Which statement reflects person-first language?

Which statement reflects person-first language?

• A. Labeling with disease terms
• B. Emphasizing the disability as central identity
• C. Using insulting terms for emphasis
• D. Using person-first language

Answer: (D)

Person-first language centers on the person, not the condition, to honor their individuality. The statement that uses phrasing like “a person with a disability” demonstrates this approach by mentioning the disability as one attribute rather than defining the person by it. This helps keep the focus on the person’s humanity. Labeling with disease terms shifts attention to the diagnosis itself, effectively reducing the person to a condition. Emphasizing the disability as central identity makes the disability the defining feature, which is the opposite of person-first language. Using insulting terms is disrespectful and harms dignity. So the option that reflects person-first language is the one that describes the person first and the condition as a secondary characteristic.

Person-first language centers on the person, not the condition, to honor their individuality. The statement that uses phrasing like “a person with a disability” demonstrates this approach by mentioning the disability as one attribute rather than defining the person by it. This helps keep the focus on the person’s humanity.

Labeling with disease terms shifts attention to the diagnosis itself, effectively reducing the person to a condition. Emphasizing the disability as central identity makes the disability the defining feature, which is the opposite of person-first language. Using insulting terms is disrespectful and harms dignity. So the option that reflects person-first language is the one that describes the person first and the condition as a secondary characteristic.